Showing posts with label Economics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Economics. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Index of Industrial Production

Index of Industrial Production 
  • The Index of Industrial Production (IIP) is an index for India which details out the growth of various sectors in an economy such as mining, electricity and manufacturing. 
  • Base year is 2004-05
  • The all India IIP is a composite indicator that measures the short-term changes in the volume of production of a basket of industrial products during a given period with respect to that in a chosen base period. 
  • It is compiled and published monthly by the Central Statistical Organisation (CSO) six weeks after the reference month ends.
  • IIP is compiled using data received from 15 source agencies viz. (i) Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion (DIPP); (ii) Indian Bureau of Mines; (iii) Central Electricity Authority; (iv) Joint Plant Committee, Ministry of Steel; (v) Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas; (vi) Office of Textile Commissioner; (vii) Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals; (viii) Directorate of Sugar & Vegetable Oils; (ix) Department of Fertilizers; (x) Tea Board; (xi) Office of Jute Commissioner; (xii) Office of Coal Controller; (xiii) Railway Board; (xiv) Office of Salt Commissioner; and (xv) Coffee Board.
• The Index of Industrial Production (IIP) is an abstract number or ratio which measures the growth of various sectors in the economy. 
• In India, IIP is a representative figure which measures the general level of Industrial activity in the country. 
• Being an abstract number, it does not show volume of activity and only shows the magnitude which represents the status of production in the industrial sector for a given period of time as compared to a reference period of time. 
• The 8 Core Industries viz. Fertilizers, Electricity, Refinery Products, Natural Gas, Steel, Cement, Crude Oil and coal [remember this by mnemonic FERNS-C3] is nearly 38% in the IIP. 
This is shown in decreasing order as follows: Electricity 10.32; Steel (Alloy + Non-alloy) 6.68; Refinery Products 5.94; Crude Oil 5.22; Coal 4.38; Cement 2.41; Natural Gas 1.71; Fertilizers 1.25.

Payments Banks

Key features of the Payments Banks guidelines are:

i) Objectives:
The objectives of setting up of payments banks will be to further financial inclusion by providing 
(i) small savings accounts and 
(ii) payments/remittance services to migrant labour workforce, low income households, small businesses, other unorganised sector entities and other users.

ii) Eligible promoters :
  1. Existing non-bank Pre-paid Payment Instrument (PPI) issuers; and other entities such as individuals / professionals; Non-Banking Finance Companies (NBFCs), corporate Business Correspondents(BCs), mobile telephone companies, super-market chains, companies, real sector cooperatives; that are owned and controlled by residents; and public sector entities may apply to set up payments banks.
  2. A promoter/promoter group can have a joint venture with an existing scheduled commercial bank to set up a payments bank. However, scheduled commercial bank can take equity stake in a payments bank to the extent permitted under Section 19 (2) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
  3. Promoter/promoter groups should be ‘fit and proper’ with a sound track record of professional experience or running their businesses for at least a period of five years in order to be eligible to promote payments banks.
iii) Scope of activities :
  1. Acceptance of demand deposits. Payments bank will initially be restricted to holding a maximum balance of Rs. 100,000 per individual customer.
  2. Issuance of ATM/debit cards. Payments banks, however, cannot issue credit cards.
  3. Payments and remittance services through various channels.
  4. BC of another bank, subject to the Reserve Bank guidelines on BCs.
  5. Distribution of non-risk sharing simple financial products like mutual fund units and insurance products, etc.
iv) Deployment of funds :
  1. The payments bank cannot undertake lending activities.
  2. Apart from amounts maintained as Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) with the Reserve Bank on its outside demand and time liabilities, it will be required to invest minimum 75 per cent of its "demand deposit balances" in Statutory Liquidity Ratio(SLR) eligible Government securities/treasury bills with maturity up to one year and hold maximum 25 per cent in current and time/fixed deposits with other scheduled commercial banks for operational purposes and liquidity management.
v) Capital requirement :
The minimum paid-up equity capital for payments banks shall be Rs. 100 crore.
  1. The payments bank should have a leverage ratio of not less than 3 per cent, i.e., its outside liabilities should not exceed 33.33 times its net worth (paid-up capital and reserves).
vi) Promoter's contribution: The promoter's minimum initial contribution to the paid-up equity capital of such payments bank shall at least be 40 per cent for the first five years from the commencement of its business.

vii) Foreign shareholding: The foreign shareholding in the payments bank would be as per the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policy for private sector banks as amended from time to time.

viii) Other conditions :
  1. The operations of the bank should be fully networked and technology driven from the beginning, conforming to generally accepted standards and norms.
  2. The bank should have a high powered Customer Grievances Cell to handle customer complaints.

Monday, June 20, 2016

SAARC Development Fund (SDF)

In 1996, a first funding mechanism was created in SAARC, ‘South Asian Development Fund (SADF), merging the SAARC Fund for Regional Projects (SFRP) and the SAARC Regional Fund. 
  • SADF objectives were to support industrial development, poverty alleviation, protection of environment, institutional/human resource development and promotion of social and infrastructure development projects in the SAARC region. 

SADF started with a resource base of US$5 million (contributed on pro-rata basis by SAARC Member States), and till its closure in June 2008, had funds amounting to approx. US$ 7.0 million. Till its closure, SADF completed techno-economic feasibility studies for sixteen project studies.
During 2002-2005, SAARC Member States considered instituting various sectoral funding mechanisms e.g. Poverty Alleviation Fund, Infrastructure Fund, South Asian Development Bank, Media Development Fund, Voluntary Fund for the Differently Able Persons. 
A primary reason was that the existing South Asian Development Fund (SADF) was found to be inadequate i.e. in terms of required quantum of funds and its limited scope of work. 
In order to avoid proliferation of funds, the SAARC Financial Experts (September 2005) looked at the entire gamut of issues relating to funding of SAARC projects and programmes; and, amongst others, agreed that in lieu of proliferating sectoral financing mechanisms, the SADF be reconstituted into the SAARC Development Fund (SDF). 
  • And, SDF would have a permanent Secretariat, with three Windows (Social, Economic, Infrastructure). 
  • The Thirteenth SAARC Summit (Dhaka, 12-13 November 2005) finally decided to reconstitute the SADF into SDF to serve as the “umbrella financial mechanism” for all SAARC projects and programmes.

  1. The Social Window would primarily focus poverty alleviation and social development projects. 
  2. The Infrastructure Window would cover projects in the areas namely energy, power, transportation, telecommunications, environment, tourism and other infrastructure areas. 
  3. The Economic Window would primarily be devoted to non-infrastructural funding.

 The Fund is to serve as the umbrella financial institution for SAARC projects and programs which are in fulfillment of the objectives of the SAARC Charter. 
SDF has three funding windows viz. Social, Economic and Infrastructure
Social Window primarily funds projects, inter alia, on poverty alleviation, social development focusing on education; health; human resources development; support to vulnerable/disadvantaged segments of the society; funding needs of communities, mircoenterprises, rural infrastructure development.
SDF is currently implementing ten regional projects with 62 implementing and lead implementing agencies covering all the eight Member States under the Social Window funding. The SDF Secretariat has already committed USD 70.27 million for social window projects as of date out of which it has disbursed USD 38.38 million to the Member States as of 19th April 2016
SDF intend to operationalize Economic and Infrastructure windows by lending/co lending for significant projects of the region which would benefit two or more countries of the SAARC region and meet the goals of regional integration and cooperation. In this direction SDF is in process of evaluating bankable projects which meet the requirements specified by SDF charter and will help in achieving/improving regional integration, economic cooperation and connectivity.
SDF plans to increase its engagements for cooperation and international collaboration with other financial institutions, multilateral organizations and Banks in an effort to make SDF a vibrant and more effective funding institution across the SAARC region.
 The objective of this exercise is to implement a comprehensive strategy for the SDF to
  • Lend to significant projects which meet the requirements of SAARC region. This would include various steps like co financing, refinancing, investments etc.
  • Mobilization of funds-SDF also simultaneously plans to raise funds so that its lending strength is in a position to meet the infrastructure, economic and social needs of the region.
  • Fund deployment for achieving results in all the three windowsEconomic, Infrastructure and Social.
  • International collaborations with other Multilateral institutions , Development organizations and Banks to ensure that programmes and projects achieve significant impact
  • Activate and operationalize
    • Social Enterprises Development Programme –
      Funding to Social Enterprises vide Social Enterprises Development Programme (SEDP) – proposed scheme is to fund 10 enterprises in each SAARC member State and
    • Line of Credit to Financial Institutions for Medium and Small Scale Enterprises
      Providing Lines of credit to Financial Institutions for meeting the fund requirements of Medium and Small Scale Enterprises requirements vide the MSME scheme
    • Project Development Facility Setting up Project Development Facility in SDF for identifying and developing priority projects
SDF has also taken a number of initiatives for strategic growth of South Asian region. Important among these is to forge relationships with multilateral and domestic institutions in SAARC Member States for taking up joint initiative and also cofunding of projects. 

Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF)

The World Bank Group today  launched the Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF), on May 21, 2016 in Japan as an innovative, fast-disbursing global financing mechanism designed to protect the world against deadly pandemics, which will create the first-ever insurance market for pandemic risk. 
  • Japan, which holds the G7 Presidency, committed the first $50 million in funding toward the new initiative.

The announcement came a week ahead of the May 26-27 Summit of Group of Seven Leaders in Ise-Shima, Japan. 
G7 leaders had urged the World Bank Group to develop the initiative during their May 2015 summit in Schloss-Elmau, Germany.
The new facility will accelerate both global and national responses to future outbreaks with pandemic potential. 
  • It was built and designed in collaboration with the World Health Organization and the private sector, introducing a new level of rigor into both the financing and the response.

The PEF includes an insurance window, which combines funding from the reinsurance markets with the proceeds of World Bank-issued pandemic (catastrophe, or Cat) bonds, as well as a complementary cash window. 
This will be the first time World Bank Cat Bonds have been used to combat infectious diseases. In the event of an outbreak, the PEF will release funds quickly to countries and qualified international responding agencies.
The insurance window will provide coverage up to $500 million for an initial period of three years for outbreaks of infectious diseases most likely to cause major epidemics, including new Orthomyxoviruses (e.g. new influenza pandemic virus A, B and C),Coronaviridae (e.g. SARS, MERS), Filoviridae (e.g. Ebola, Marburg) and other zoonotic diseases (e.g. Crimean Congo, Rift Valley, Lassa fever).  
Parametric triggers designed with publicly available data will determine when the money would be released, based on the size, severity and spread of the outbreak.
The complementary cash window will provide more flexible funding to address a larger set of emerging pathogens, which may not yet meet the activation criteria for the insurance window.
  • All 77 countries eligible for financing from the International Development Association, the World Bank Group’s fund for the poorest countries, will be eligible to receive coverage from the PEF. 
  • The PEF is expected to be operational later this year.

Recent economic analysis suggests that the annual global cost of moderately severe to severe pandemics is roughly $570 billion, or 0.7 percent of global GDP. 
A very severe pandemic like the 1918 Spanish flu could cost as much as 5 percent of global GDP, or nearly $4 trillion.
During the past two years alone, pandemic threats have included the devastating Ebola crisis in West Africa—which crippled the economies of Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, and cost them an estimated $2.8 billion in GDP losses ($600 million in Guinea, $300 million in Liberia and $1.9 billion in Sierra Leone); the MERS outbreak, which took a toll on the South Korean economy; and the Zika virus that is spreading in the Americas and putting thousands of unborn children at risk.
Four global expert panels that were convened over the past year in the wake of the Ebola crisis concluded that the world must urgently step up its capacity for a swift response to outbreaks before they become more deadly and costly pandemics. 
The PEF will do a number of important things to prevent another Ebola crisis:
  • It will insure the world’s poorest countries against the threat of a pandemic.
  • In the event of a severe infectious disease outbreak, it will release funds quickly to the countries and/or to international responders, to accelerate the response—saving lives and reducing human suffering. 
  • By mobilizing an earlier, faster, better planned and coordinated response, it will reduce the costs to countries and their people for response and recovery.
  • It will promote greater global and national investments in preparing for future outbreaks and strengthening national health systems. 
  • It will combine public and private resources to advance global health security, and create a new insurance market for managing pandemic risk.
The World Bank Group estimates that if the PEF had existed in mid-2014 as the Ebola outbreak was spreading rapidly in West Africa, it could have mobilized an initial $100 million as early as July to severely limit the spread and severity of the epidemic. Instead, money at that scale did not begin to flow until three months later. During that three month period, the number of Ebola cases increased tenfold. 
The Ebola epidemic has claimed more than 11,300 lives and cost at least $10 billion to date. International assistance has totaled more than $7 billion for Ebola response and recovery. 

Friday, March 18, 2016

'Pigovian Tax' & 'Tobin Tax '

What is a 'Pigovian Tax'


A Pigovian tax is a special tax that is often levied on companies, traders etc. that pollute the environment or create excess social costs, called negative externalities, through business practices. In a true market economy, a Pigovian tax is the most efficient and effective way to correct negative externalities.

A type of a Pigovian tax is a "sin tax", which is a special tax on tobacco products and alcohol.


In the recent budget FM announced an increase in the STT (Securities Transaction Tax) on equity options from 0.017% to 0.05%. This has been done to neutralize social costs of equity options speculation and promote equity investment for long term.

What is a 'Tobin Tax '?

A means of taxing spot currency conversions that was originally suggested by American economist James Tobin.
The Tobin tax was developed with the intention of penalizing short-term currency speculation, and to place a tax on all spot conversions of currency. Rather than a consumption tax paid by consumers, the Tobin tax was meant to apply to financial sector participants as a means of controlling the stability of a given country's currency.



Friday, January 1, 2016

Stiglitz on Economy

  • The obstacles the global economy faces are not rooted in economics, but in politics and ideology.
  • While our banks are back to a reasonable state of health, they have demonstrated that they are not fit to fulfill their purpose. They excel in exploitation and market manipulation; but they have failed in their essential function of inter-mediation. Between long-term savers (for example, sovereign wealth funds and those saving for retirement) and long-term investment in infrastructure stands our short-sighted and dysfunctional financial sector.
  • If the country cannot resolve its own problems in a way that the rest of the world believes is fair; if it cannot, with all of its wealth, even provide health care for all of its citizens; if it cannot, with all of its wealth, deliver quality education for all of its young; if it cannot, with all of its wealth, afford to spend the money required for the kind of modern infrastructure, energy, and transportation systems that global warming demands—then how can it provide advice to others on how they should resolve their problems?

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Special Safeguard Mechanism

Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM)


It has been defined by World Trade Organisation (WTO) as "A tool that will allow developing countries to raise tariffs temporarily to deal with import surges or price falls".

Need for it:

“Developed countries are giving 70-80% subsidies to their farmers, which only they can afford to give. We don’t have the wherewithal to pay these kinds of subsidies. It distorts prices and make our farmers vulnerable when the products hit our markets. It is against those kinds of aberrations that we need protection. That’s what SSM will do."
                                                                                             -  Rita Teaotia (trade secretary)

A world bank paper http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2010/06/06/000158349_20100606235900/Rendered/PDF/WPS5334.pdf says that 

"Agricultural producers in developing countries are vulnerable to shocks both domestically—particularly from weather-related shocks to output—and from shocks to international markets. However, it must be remembered that consumers in developing countries are also particularly vulnerable to shocks to food prices, given that the poorest people spend as much as three quarters of their incomes on food. Policy measures that raise the price of food by imposing an import duty may help farmers whose incomes have fallen due to a harvest shortfall, but will do so at the expense of net buyers of food— including many farmers—as they will be hurt by the increase in the price of food. If farmers are isolated from world markets by poor infrastructure and communications, an even worse possibility emerges in which protection raises the cost of food to poor consumers linked to world markets, while providing little or no benefit to producers in more isolated locations. This highlights the need for careful analysis of the impact of special safeguards taking into account the potential differentiation between imported and domestic goods."

Doha Development Agenda and the origin of the SSM

At the Doha Ministerial Conference, the developing countries were given a concession to adopt a Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM) besides the existing safeguards (like the Special Agricultural Safeguard or the SSG). 

This SSM constituted an important part of the promises offered to the developing world at Doha (known as Doha Development Agenda) and the Doha MC became known as a development round.

Special Agricultural Safeguard (SSG)

The Special Agricultural Safeguard (SSG) is provision in the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture. The SSG allows Member countries to impose additional tariffs on agricultural products if their import volume exceeds defined trigger levels, or if prices fall below specified trigger levels. Its purpose is to prevent disruption of domestic markets due to import surges or abnormally low import prices.

Difference between SSM and other safeguards under Agreement on Agriculture

The SSG was available to all countries- both developing and developed whereas the SSM is allowable only to the developing countries.

It is to be mentioned that the SSG was available as it was inducted under the GATT agreement; whereas the SSM was the invention of the Doha MC.



Monday, October 20, 2014

Quantitative easing (QE)

Quantitative easing (QE) is an unconventional monetary policy used by central banks to stimulate the economy when standard monetary policy has become ineffective.

A central bank implements quantitative easing by buying specified amounts of financial assets from commercial banks and other private institutions, thus raising the prices of those financial assets and lowering their yield, while simultaneously increasing the monetary base.

(In economics, the monetary base in a country is defined as the portion of the commercial banks' reserves that are maintained in accounts with their central bank plus the total currency circulating in the public (which includes the currency, also known as vault cash, that is physically held in the banks' vault). The monetary base should not be confused with the money supply which consists of the total currency circulating in the public plus the non-bank deposits with commercial banks.)

The Expansionary monetary policy is used to stimulate the economy which involves the central bank buying short-term government bonds in order to lower short-term market interest rates.However, when short-term interest rates have reached or are close to reaching zero, this method can no longer work. 
Quantitative easing may then be used by monetary authorities to further stimulate the economy by purchasing assets of longer maturity than short-term government bonds, and thereby lowering longer-term interest rates further out on the yield curve.

Monday, April 21, 2014

Nachiket Mor Committee on Financial Inclusion


  • It has proposed universal electronic bank accounts to all Indian citizens above the age of 18 by Jan 2016.
  • Access points would be within 15 minutes of walking distance.
  • Each low income household and small business will have access to formally regulated lenders and also access to deposit and investment products at reasonable charges.
  • An instruction to open the bank account should be initiated by the UIDAI after the issue of an Aadhaar No. to an individual over the age of 18.

Sunday, April 13, 2014

Urijit Panel Report


Urijit Patel, Deputy Governor RBI, headed the committee to revise and strengthen the monetary policy framework.The Committee said inflation should be the nominal anchor of the monetary policy framework and it should be defined without ambiguity.
  • The panel suggested adopting a longer term target of 4% for CPI inflation with a band of (+/-) 2 per cent.
  • In current situation the target should be 
    •    8% in the coming 12 months
    •    6% in the coming 24 months
  •  RBI has accepted the CPI as the anchor for Inflation Targeting (IT) with effect from 01st April 2014.